A comparison of the books utopia by thomas moore and the prince by machiavelli

The urgency of his obligations may well explain the haste of his remarriage: Like many Catholic apologists, he claimed misguidedly that Luther's teaching of justification by faith alone was a license for immoral conduct.

As his reported words to the court make clear, he considered himself to be dying for the sake of the unity of Christendom.

The irony needs no comment. Many ideas from the governments they portray have profound impacts on our modern government such as various political principles like the military, economy, and religion. More, being a devout Catholic, was incensed that the king would callously put away his devout Catholic queen, Catherine of Aragon.

Grocyn returned there in after a period of study in Florence and had given the first Greek lectures in the university, but he moved in to London, where More would have had easy access to his teaching.

A Compare and Contrast of Thomas Moore’s Utopia and Machiavelli's the Prince

Philosophers, he concludes, cannot serve: The later scholastics, in their quest for a meta-language purified of subjective reference, had reinvented Latin as a wholly artificial construction closed to outsiders.

Life and Works On the title-page of Utopia Thomas More identifies himself as a citizen of the renowned city of London. Essentially, it imagined a primeval state of human association, prior to the invention of property and the laws which protect it, when all could have access to nature's fruits as their needs dictated.

He cited the grievous example of Agathocles of Syracuse, who rose to power through heinous means.

A Compare and Contrast of Thomas Moore's Utopia and Machiavelli's the Prince

But that, of course, meant focussing on Utopian institutions rather than on the mediating dialogue—on the blueprint rather than the fiction—and this becomes the dominant characteristic of most readings and translations of Utopia down to recent times Nelson It had ceased to be communicative speech.

It is significant that the case for this rhetorical approach is linked in with a passing reference to human imperfection: This is not so much a paean for representative government as a tentative proposal to curb the darker passions which underlie the political world.

But if the leader is a bad leader, a power driven leader, a leader who puts himself first, and lets his people starve while he and his nobles live in excess, then the society and land will not flourish.

There are many ways to analyze the society of Utopia. In Richard III a major theme is this discrepancy between public performance and hidden motive, and More conveys it figuratively through the image of the theatre: The women are allowed to do mostly everything such work, vote, and actually have an influence in foreign affairs.

They take an oath to choose the man they think best qualified; and then by secret ballot they elect they prince from among four men nominated by the people of the four sections of the city.

The prince in Utopia is there to provide stability. It may have been on just such terms that he entered a world which he had previously satirized. If the peace of Cambrai might satisfy his first requirement, the two other issues would prove more problematic.

The Theatre of Politics One of the best known anecdotes about More concerns a visit paid by the king to his house at Chelsea: Miller and Stephen M.

A Compare and Contrast of Thomas Moore's Utopia and Machiavelli's The Prince

All other officials hold office for a single year only. Erasmus, an admiring witness of this novelty, reports that the girls all had Livy in their hands CWE 8: Roper reports a conversation with his father-in-law in which More declared that he would gladly be thrown into the Thames in a sack if only three things could realized: He was heavily engaged in London affairs, representing the city in Henry VIII's first Parliament, and in September he became one of its two Undersheriffs, the office by which he identifies himself on the title-page of Utopia.

The quibbles of the logicians, by contrast, exclude those who, like the Utopians, have not been initiated into their artificial procedures. More is pointing obliquely at the evil of enclosures by which peasants are driven from the land to make way for the more profitable returns of sheep farming, a clear instance of vested interests acting against the common good.

Various explanations have been proffered as to why More left the work unfinished—it seems unlikely that pressure of work would have been the sole cause.

The latter, in particular, would have interested More, not least because Augustine in the City of God praises his analysis of the moral collapse of the Roman Republic. One of the most vivid episodes in Utopia is the account of the Anemolian ambassadors: Yale University Press, — Often, Utopia, the product of a profound thinker who was still developing his thought, seems to question itself.

The Historia concludes with the coronation of the usurper Richard, while the History continues with the murder of his nephews and breaks off in mid-flight as Bishop Morton, later More's own mentor, tries to turn the Duke of Buckingham against the king. The role of courtiers should be to counsel the prince, but in each episode they are presented as amoral opportunists whose sole aim is to flatter him.

The one other work of a specifically political character which More wrote was The History of King Richard the Third, alternatively the Historia Richardi Tertii since it was written in both English and Latin versions.

By making his Utopians adopt a communality of possessions More liberates them from the passions generated by acquisition and loss; by the same token, they are relieved of the whole ideological burden which distorts European society.

Thomas More, 15 vols. Baker-Smith 19might raise a knowing smile, but a few years later it could fuel something much more alarming. Early in the following year, he married Jane Colt and moved into the Old Barge, Bucklersbury, a residence large enough to permit a flow of guests; among them was Erasmus, who arrived in Augustfull of anticipation of patronage under the new king and carrying in his head the initial idea for The Praise of Folly.A Comparison of Societies in Machiavelli's The Prince and More's Utopia A perfect society has always been the goal for many; unfortunately it has only existed in books.

Two of the most publicized ideals regarding this subject are found through the works of Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas More in The Prince and Utopia, respectively. The ideas presented are not complementary in the slightest%(5). Thomas More (–) was an English lawyer, humanist, statesman, and Catholic martyr, whose paradoxical life is reflected in his contrasting titles: he was knighted by King Henry VIII in and canonized by Pope Pius XI in Utopia by Thomas More and The Prince by Machiavelli Essay Words | 4 Pages.

Utopia by Thomas More and The Prince by Machiavelli Thomas More’s Utopia and Machiavelli’s The Prince both concern themselves with the fundamental issues of how a society works and maintains itself.

A comparison of the books utopia by thomas moore and the prince by machiavelli

From a general summary to chapter summaries to explanations of famous quotes, the SparkNotes Utopia Study Guide has everything you need to ace quizzes, tests, and essays.

- Human Nature in The Prince by Machiavelli and Utopia by Thomas More It is difficult to determine Niccolo Machiavelli?s and Thomas More?s view on human?s nature. Each took a different approach to the topic.

The Prince and Utopia

Through Utopia, Thomas More attempted to change man?s thinking by creating an ideological society.

Download
A comparison of the books utopia by thomas moore and the prince by machiavelli
Rated 5/5 based on 85 review